Hardik Pandya divorce has been trending all over since long. Now, Hardik Pandya and Natasa Stankovic have officially confirmed their divorce, ending weeks of speculation.
In a joint statement on social media, they announced their mutual decision to separate. The statement, released after Natasa and their son Agastya left Mumbai, read: “After four years together, we have decided to part ways amicably.” They acknowledged the difficulty of the decision, citing the joy, respect, and companionship they shared as a family. The couple expressed their commitment to co-parenting their son Agastya, requesting privacy during this challenging time.
Hardik Pandya divorce
The statement reads: “After 4 years of being together, Hardik and I have decided to mutually part ways,” the statement says. We feel that this is best for the two of us because we gave it our all and tried our hardest together. We had a lot of joy, respect for one another, and companionship as a family, therefore this was a difficult choice for us to make.”
“We are blessed with Agastya, who will continue to be at the centre of both our lives and we will co-parent to ensure that we give him everything that we can for his happiness. We sincerely request your support and understanding to give us the privacy during this difficult and sensitive time.”
Recent reports estimated Hardik Pandya’s net worth at approximately Rs 94 crore, with a monthly income of Rs 1.5 crore and an annual BCCI deal worth Rs 5 crore. His wife, Natasa Stankovic, has an estimated net worth of Rs 20 crore. Hardik Pandya’s income also comes from various brand endorsements and sponsored partnerships. He owns several high-end vehicles and has invested in real estate, including a penthouse in Vadodara and a flat in Mumbai.
Is Hardik Pandya set to lose 70% from Natasa Stankovic?
Recent media reports claimed that Natasa Stankovic would receive 70% of Hardik Pandya’s assets in their divorce settlement.
However, an old video featuring Hardik Pandya on Gaurav Kapur’s show resurfaced, in which he revealed that he doesn’t own any properties or assets in his name.
Instead, his mother is the co-owner of all his assets, including his cars and house. This statement sparked interesting discussions amidst the divorce proceedings.
